View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
RJUCPU
Joined: 28 Jan 2007 Posts: 1827 Location: Scottsdale, AZ
|
Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
bclare wrote: |
Furthermore, you don't need to put in a percent, score is the only required field. If you don't want to put in a percent fine, but if you're going to put it in then you should put in what the overall percent says on the results screen. |
I agree with this completely and brought this up in an earlier post. I would much rather see no percents than 99%'s and if I couldn't FC a song without dropping ticks that's exactly what I would do.
Score is all that matters. Why the percent is such a huge debate is beyond me and I'm totally flabbergasted that people would even think to suggest that proof of a percent should be / would be required. That's absolutely preposterous in 99.9% of songs (exceptions being broken/semi-broken talkies). Nobody questions note streaks and there are more wrong ones entered by far. They are just as worthless. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anexa
Joined: 30 Jun 2008 Posts: 43 Location: Colmar, France/ San Antonio, Texas
|
Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:05 pm Post subject: 99% bug :( |
|
|
I'm not exactly interested in posting scores here anymore. I suck at score whoring, and I only cared about RBN stuff (read: Amberian Dawn), so I'm not overly concerned about the score part of things, but I did run into this today.
I'm not familiar with the past experiences with this.. I never played TB:RB or GD:RB (not interested in band specific games, nor either of these bands) so this was the first time I ever ran into it.
Essentially I FCed (or at least in theory?) Army of the Damned (nice song btw, pick it up if you haven't already). I never broke combo throughout the entire song, but I ended up with 99% at the end. I was disgusted.
I busted my butt and FCed it again (had difficulties with being too loud due to lyrical voice so I had to work around till I could sort it out) and AGAIN ended up with 99%. I happened to be recording both times. I went through the videos and double checked in case I missed something, nope 99%.
It's kind of disgusting, I feel a little ripped off. Is this just a bug? Am I doing something wrong? Perhaps I'm not sufficient enough? How do I consider this in my personal goals? Is it an "FC"? It is a bare miss?
My score landed me 2nd place on the leaderboard.. short by 3,444 (or somewhere around there, less than 4k by a few hundred) points. Now, if it counts me as 99% (as if I broke combo) that is a potential 4 thousand points right there which would actually place me in first.
Or is score unaffected in this bug?
Blah either way I'm rather disheartened about it. :/ _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ShiftBreaker
Joined: 17 Jun 2007 Posts: 4708
|
Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Theoretically, would it be possible to get a 98% FC or 97% FC if you got an awesome on every phrase on a song, but only just? I know it may be difficult to only just get an awesome on every phrase on a song, but I am curious to see how much this glitch or non-glitch as it is can affect songs. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
bclare
Joined: 21 Jun 2008 Posts: 6048 Location: Boston
|
Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 12:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
You can only keep combo by getting about 980/1000 or higher, although maybe the cutoff is slightly below that. Either way it might be possible to get a 98% FC but only just barely. _________________
I'm back I suppose |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucasPWNS8907
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 181
|
Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
what about this "glitch" in full band if you're posting a full band FC? does the vocalist have to not miss out on any ticks or is the 99% FC legitimate? it sure looks awful on the stats screen (luckily, i haven't run into this problem yet but the day i do i will be pissed). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blingdomepiece
Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 4358 Location: Ottawa ON Canada
|
Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have one "99% FC" so far and I actually expected it, because it was a phrase I was kind surprised to get Awesome on instead of Strong (I got lost on a phrase and mumbled it). My accuracy was 39994 out of 40000 I believe. If you are getting 99% FCs, I would reconsider whether you are actually nailing every phrase. _________________
Expert Pro Keys: 50/63 GS, most recent The Killing Moon
Expert Pro Drums: 53/83 GS, most recent Free Bird / Oh My God / Oye Mi Amor
Expert Pro Bass: 6/83 GS, most recent Everybody Wants to Rule the World
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucasPWNS8907
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 181
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
MasterNobody
Joined: 11 Jul 2008 Posts: 2791 Location: Duxbury, MA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Glad we got proof finally.
Personally I say if you get gipped out of a 100% by the above (full accuracy), an obvious glitch, than you can post a 100% in the leaderboards. If you do not have full accuracy than I think it still has to be a 99%, because well...you don't have full accuracy xP _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
MetalPanda
Joined: 10 Mar 2009 Posts: 201
|
Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 9:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Funny to see ''FINALLY the ultimate proof is THERE!'' and yeah... need Facebook to see, ah well. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucasPWNS8907
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 181
|
Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MetalPanda wrote: | Funny to see ''FINALLY the ultimate proof is THERE!'' and yeah... need Facebook to see, ah well. |
perhaps i can post it somewhere public? do you have any ideas for where i could post it? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CyberRaiza
Joined: 02 Oct 2008 Posts: 1194
|
Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My two cents is that regardless of what we've known to be the legitimate arbiter (final stat screen) the breakdown for every section is obviously more legitimate because it doesnt glitch. So instead of defaulting to something we know is wrong because we're afraid and uncomfortable to move away from our comfort zone and accept a change lets use common sense and change the "arbiter" to the correct breakdown.
an FC is an FC and 100% of notes hit is 100% of notes hit (regardless of what the glitched final screen says). _________________
"It is dangerous to be right in matters in which the established authorities are wrong"
"When things go wrong I seem to be bad
But I'm just a soul whose intentions are good
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
"And no one, thinks, they are to blame
Why can't we see, that when we bleed we bleed the same" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RJUCPU
Joined: 28 Jan 2007 Posts: 1827 Location: Scottsdale, AZ
|
Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucasPWNS8907 wrote: | MetalPanda wrote: | Funny to see ''FINALLY the ultimate proof is THERE!'' and yeah... need Facebook to see, ah well. |
perhaps i can post it somewhere public? do you have any ideas for where i could post it? |
Imageshack is popular and no account is required. Photobucket is also a choice but you do need an account there. Both are public and that's where most the pics attached to scores here are hosted. Once you host it somewhere you can just embed the photo here using the [IMG ] tags then the pic will show instead of the link. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucasPWNS8907
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 181
|
Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"Imageshack is popular and no account is required. Photobucket is also a choice but you do need an account there. Both are public and that's where most the pics attached to scores here are hosted. Once you host it somewhere you can just embed the photo here using the [IMG ] tags then the pic will show instead of the link."
i am a failure lol i can't get the images to work
just look below at the post from someone smarter than me that knows how to do this shit lol. those images below are what i got
Last edited by LucasPWNS8907 on Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:45 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PlexShaw
Joined: 19 Sep 2007 Posts: 332 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
These?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hobo111
Joined: 27 Dec 2009 Posts: 3414
|
Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucasPWNS8907 wrote: |
i am a failure lol i can't get the images to work
[img]http://img163.imageshack.us/i/99glitch.jpg/[/img]
[img]http://img231.imageshack.us/i/99glitchpart2.jpg/[/img] |
Are you sure you're supposed to have the slash after the jpg part?
Edit: Shit, nevermind |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|