FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Is Plasma better than LCD?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ScoreHero Forum Index -> Hardware
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Mac10Morph  





Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Posts: 245
Location: Binghamton, NY

PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 5:49 pm    Post subject: Is Plasma better than LCD? Reply with quote

So we're getting a new tv. We're thinking 42" HDTV. Well I'm aware that some LCD's have issues with lag on RockBand. I've actually played on a friends LCD and after calibrating numerous times it just seemed a bit off anyway. So I wanted to ask if plasma TVs tended to be better for the lag issues since I can get the same size plasma for roughly the same price. DLP is out of the question though because I absolutely have no room.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message XBL Gamertag: Mac10Morph
Kelsin  





Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Posts: 1088
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada =D

PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For gaming LCD is always better, but plasma cant be bad.
I played on 3 LCD TVs and I never got any lag issues
_________________
Back? Maybe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message PSN Name: SoccerThierry
oopogfe  





Joined: 19 May 2008
Posts: 429
Location: Fresno, CA

PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 6:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK here's the thing

I have and LCD and a Plasma.

The LCD is great for gaming, and even has a gaming mode, but there is a huge lag during drum fills, so it makes it unplayable for me.

However, the Plasma has absolutely no lag at all. Thats what I play rock band on and its perfect.

But........every TV is different and I know that a lot of Plasma's will have some lag. Your safest bet is to get a LCD that is NOT Samsung, I say that because my lcd is samsung, and my friend's DLP tv is Samsung, and we both have the same lag issue.
_________________
OOPOGFE, pronounced ooh-poag-ah-feee
Back to top
View user's profile Wiki User Page Send private message Visit poster's website XBL Gamertag: oopogfe
wder75  





Joined: 25 Feb 2007
Posts: 47
Location: Columbus, OH

PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is not so much an issue with the type of TV or the company, it is about the respone time. Look for that in the specifications of the TV. You generally want something less than 5ms. For example, I've played on my 22" monitor that has a 5ms response time and it was perfect, no lag at all. But I played on our 42" Sony LCD TV, and it was hard to play because of lag, and its response time is 8ms.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
DorkmasterFlek  





Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Posts: 1968
Location: Toronto, ON

PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Any new LDC TV will have some kind of "game mode" which reduces the latency noticeably. It's pretty much impossible to play a music game like RB or GH without it.
_________________
wlinn751 wrote:
Everybody likes Boston on some level. They're like a soul detector. Most people don't know this, but vampire hunters carry a Talkboy containing a snippet of More Than A Feeling. Anyone who doesn't smile when they hear it gets staked on the spot. It works flawlessly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nalk  





Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 260
Location: Troy, NY / Hillsboro OR

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wder75 wrote:
It is not so much an issue with the type of TV or the company, it is about the respone time. Look for that in the specifications of the TV. You generally want something less than 5ms. For example, I've played on my 22" monitor that has a 5ms response time and it was perfect, no lag at all. But I played on our 42" Sony LCD TV, and it was hard to play because of lag, and its response time is 8ms.


Actually, it has little to do with response time. Response time is a measure of the time it takes a pixel to go from black to white to black. The source of most lag in HDTVs is due to the signal processor in the TV. The TV may be running any number of smoothing or scaling algorithms that delay the rate at which the image gets to the screen. However, the TV also delays the sound by the same amount, meaning that you will not notice "lag" when watching TV or playing movies. However, the console still runs independently, processing out-of-sync button presses.

The symptoms of "response time" lag are ghosting and blurred imagery. Input lag is something completely different. Like others have said, some TVs offer gaming modes that bypass elements of the signal processor in order to reach the game quicker. Computer LCDs are designed to take one source (usually DVI) and immediately display it, causing no lag.

As to the original question, either technology can be affected by lag. As far as I know, there is no standard metric to measure signal display lag. It's best to read reviews from others who have used the TV in the past.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website PSN Name: Nalk
stubbs99  





Joined: 26 Jan 2008
Posts: 237
Location: Norwich, England

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a Samsung LCD TV. I just pick the default 'LCD' setting in the calibrate menu and the timing feels perfect.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website XBL Gamertag: stubbs99 PSN Name: stubbs99/xanadu314
zombie1942  





Joined: 09 Apr 2007
Posts: 241

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nalk wrote:
The source of most lag in HDTVs is due to the signal processor in the TV.


this.

its not really the LCD or Plasma but how well the tv is processing video and audio...

when you enter the HD world, you are throwing in analog to digital processing of audio and video... this is what makes lag... both the drum fill stuff and the lag in game.

its really a hit and miss thing... RCA (red, white, yellow) probably give you your best setup to minimize lag as they are analog cables... but it just depends on how the tv tries to process everything.

The best setup ive seen with an HD tv is video to tv and audio into a stereo receiver that is set to analog and the white and red audio cables used.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oopogfe  





Joined: 19 May 2008
Posts: 429
Location: Fresno, CA

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

stubbs99 wrote:
I have a Samsung LCD TV. I just pick the default 'LCD' setting in the calibrate menu and the timing feels perfect.


has anyone seen the samsung tv's in gamestop in which the wii's are hooked up too? well I have one of those, the default setting works horribly and my gaming mode is turned on. And like I said, the fills lag is horrible.
_________________
OOPOGFE, pronounced ooh-poag-ah-feee
Back to top
View user's profile Wiki User Page Send private message Visit poster's website XBL Gamertag: oopogfe
Chatboy91  





Joined: 07 Jul 2008
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 5:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I personally play on a 60' plasma screen TV. No lag at all, when I play Rock Band on my PS3. If I play GH3 on Wii however (I got GH3 when I still didn't have a PS3) it lags pretty badly. It depends on the source, and the TV. If you don't have a good HD source (e.g. Wii) then your TV will probably lag just trying to upconvert the signal. When I got RB though, I had absolutely no problems with lag when I told it I was using a plasma TV. Plasma TVs usually have better response times then LCDs (even new ones with the 120hz refresh rates don't match the speed of a plasma). But, which TV you get depends on what you need, and the room you'll be playing in. If the room has lots of natural lighting, get an LCD, but if you're really worried about lag get a plasma. Colors, blacks, and everything looks better on plasmas, and you have a larger viewing angle. Also, I have never had a burn-in problem, if anything does burn-in a bit, it disappears after watching something.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FlorisJan  





Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 461
Location: Wakaw, Saskatchewan, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 5:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

stubbs99 wrote:
I have a Samsung LCD TV. I just pick the default 'LCD' setting in the calibrate menu and the timing feels perfect.


Even though there is a setting for LCD on Rockband, it doesn't mean your LCD will have that amount of latency.

I have a 42" LCD TV (Sharp Aquos brand) and the LCD setting on Rockband is too high, I had to manually reduce it to about 5ms.


Every TV has different settings for Rockband, some work better than others.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger XBL Gamertag: Floris Jan
Kyahx  





Joined: 21 Oct 2007
Posts: 52

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I find the issue with lag has little to do with the TV itself, but the audio processor. We have two Samsung LCDs at home, both have a gaming mode and are perfect for playing Rock Band on. (In fact when your looking at TVs, I can't recommend Samsung high enough, by far my favorite LCD manufacturer.)

The thing you need to do is run the audio from the console straight into your audio receiver, and use the analog audio (red/white RCA plugs) if you can. This is how I've set up RB on both of my systems (VGA to the TV, Analog audio straight into the receiver) and both are less than 15ms off.

Plus all of this will be much less-an-issue when RB2 comes out, with the auto-calibrating guitar and improved manual calibration screen. So buy the TV that looks the best to you, I highly recommend an LCD for gaming and anything by Samsung in general.
_________________
Gamertag: Kyahx
My Drum Scores (X)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message XBL Gamertag: Kyahx
FelixTheCat  





Joined: 17 Feb 2007
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 5:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not that this makes me any smarter than the avid tech geek but I do work for one of the top 3 electronics manufacturers. No, not a store that sells electronics, I work for the actual manufacturer, doing tech support.

Let me respond to a couple things said here.

RESPONSE TIME: this truly is NO issue at all. Being that the fastest any information is going to be sent to your panel is 16ms, a TV with 5ms, 4ms etc is no different than a TV with an 8ms response time.

BETTER BLACK LEVEL/ VIEWING ANGLE? This is simple not true by any means. LCD is every bit as good as plasma for brightness, black level, contrast and viewing angle. The advantages that plasma held over LCD in these departments has been dead for 3 years.

GAME MODE: This is a VERY important feature. You want the TV to be doing as little processing as possible. As previously mentioned when viewing TV broadcast, the TV lags everything so it all matches up. Well, the TV is not so good at doing this on fast paced video games.

LAG: You can get lag on any brand, and on both plasma and LCD. This has NOTHING to do with LCD or plasma technology in itself.

120hz: Although when viewing a video game source 120hz panels are not going to be much different than a 60hz panel. HOWEVER, most TVs that have 120hz panels are going to have the other internal goods that you DO need to get a nice clear, smooth, lag free image.

VIDEO PROCESSOR: THIS should be number 1 on your MUST HAVE specifications. Do not settle for anything less than a 14bit video processor. If this spec is not listed for the model you are looking at, pass it up. I say this spec is a MUST VERIFY.

LCD vs Plasma: Personally I prefer LCD as I own 5 of them and they draw less power than plasma. Although plasma has come a long way in preventing burn in, it STILL HAPPENS. One person mentions earlier "it goes away". That's not burn in, that's image retention and happens on all plasmas under normal use.

I have my LCDs on at least 70% of the time as I work from home and have a PC connected to each one of them as well as cable, HD DVD, video games, etc. With LCD I do not have to worry about burn in at all. If I used a plasma the way I personally use my LCDs, I would toast it within the year.

However, if you don't watch a lot of anamorphic widescreen movies, have no need to connect a PC, don't leave it on all day, etc then don't fear the plasma. It is a great technology, it just doesn't fit my needs.



No matter what you buy, expect to do some calibrating. Go into the store and look at all the models that have a 14bit video processor and a game mode and work from there as you DO NOT want to buy a model without these. Don't get me wrong, you can still calibrate one without them but you will be much better off with these key features.

Last note. do NOT buy it online. You can get great deals, I know but these TVs are not designed for individual shipment and you stand a high risk of shipping damage and/ or damage that you may not see for some time. At any rate, these damages are NOT covered by your warranty.

Either way you go, you will be happy.
_________________
Photobucket

Check out my cymbals mod video and tutorial here. http://rockband.scorehero.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6408
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oopogfe  





Joined: 19 May 2008
Posts: 429
Location: Fresno, CA

PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FelixTheCat wrote:
Not that this makes me any smarter than the avid tech geek but I do work for one of the top 3 electronics manufacturers. No, not a store that sells electronics, I work for the actual manufacturer, doing tech support.

Let me respond to a couple things said here.

RESPONSE TIME: this truly is NO issue at all. Being that the fastest any information is going to be sent to your panel is 16ms, a TV with 5ms, 4ms etc is no different than a TV with an 8ms response time.

BETTER BLACK LEVEL/ VIEWING ANGLE? This is simple not true by any means. LCD is every bit as good as plasma for brightness, black level, contrast and viewing angle. The advantages that plasma held over LCD in these departments has been dead for 3 years.

GAME MODE: This is a VERY important feature. You want the TV to be doing as little processing as possible. As previously mentioned when viewing TV broadcast, the TV lags everything so it all matches up. Well, the TV is not so good at doing this on fast paced video games.

LAG: You can get lag on any brand, and on both plasma and LCD. This has NOTHING to do with LCD or plasma technology in itself.

120hz: Although when viewing a video game source 120hz panels are not going to be much different than a 60hz panel. HOWEVER, most TVs that have 120hz panels are going to have the other internal goods that you DO need to get a nice clear, smooth, lag free image.

VIDEO PROCESSOR: THIS should be number 1 on your MUST HAVE specifications. Do not settle for anything less than a 14bit video processor. If this spec is not listed for the model you are looking at, pass it up. I say this spec is a MUST VERIFY.

LCD vs Plasma: Personally I prefer LCD as I own 5 of them and they draw less power than plasma. Although plasma has come a long way in preventing burn in, it STILL HAPPENS. One person mentions earlier "it goes away". That's not burn in, that's image retention and happens on all plasmas under normal use.

I have my LCDs on at least 70% of the time as I work from home and have a PC connected to each one of them as well as cable, HD DVD, video games, etc. With LCD I do not have to worry about burn in at all. If I used a plasma the way I personally use my LCDs, I would toast it within the year.

However, if you don't watch a lot of anamorphic widescreen movies, have no need to connect a PC, don't leave it on all day, etc then don't fear the plasma. It is a great technology, it just doesn't fit my needs.



No matter what you buy, expect to do some calibrating. Go into the store and look at all the models that have a 14bit video processor and a game mode and work from there as you DO NOT want to buy a model without these. Don't get me wrong, you can still calibrate one without them but you will be much better off with these key features.

Last note. do NOT buy it online. You can get great deals, I know but these TVs are not designed for individual shipment and you stand a high risk of shipping damage and/ or damage that you may not see for some time. At any rate, these damages are NOT covered by your warranty.

Either way you go, you will be happy.


I have a question for you then,

the lcd I mentioned before, is there any way to fix that kind of lag?

Ive heard it happens to a lot of people with DLP tv's,

It does have a gaming mode, and it is turned on, is there anything i can do?
_________________
OOPOGFE, pronounced ooh-poag-ah-feee
Back to top
View user's profile Wiki User Page Send private message Visit poster's website XBL Gamertag: oopogfe
tatical  





Joined: 23 Aug 2008
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

plasma comes out better the lcd imo i have both and play on the plasma a lot more
_________________
drummer dino
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message XBL Gamertag: TaTiCaL G
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ScoreHero Forum Index -> Hardware All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum





Copyright © 2006-2024 ScoreHero, LLC
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy


Powered by phpBB