View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
EaterOfCheese
Joined: 19 Jan 2008 Posts: 175
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, for the new WGFA path, I compared it to the old one (which I had just quickly skimmed over without really looking at). It became apparent pretty quickly that the new path is just straight up better for points. Hits more notes, and doesn't really affect any other overdrives, if I remember correctly (maybe one or two). _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Equinox
Joined: 08 May 2007 Posts: 19
|
Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 5:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
maybe I'm crazy
But for Dani California you have 1-0-0-0-0
But I could have sworn my gold star score
I just used
1-0-0-0-0-0
same thing with In bloom it seemed you missed 1 sp phrase.
Anyways it worked on D.c.
I beat my old score by 10k |
|
Back to top |
|
|
EaterOfCheese
Joined: 19 Jan 2008 Posts: 175
|
Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 5:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm, just looked at the charts again, and I believe both of them are correct. It probably just seems like more because you activate so many times :P _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
GurnKiller
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2319 Location: Central NJ
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
EaterOfCheese
Joined: 19 Jan 2008 Posts: 175
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, I see it now Gurn. I didn't realize you could activate immediately in m27. I'll fix it now. Thanks _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
GurnKiller
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2319 Location: Central NJ
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
GurnKiller
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2319 Location: Central NJ
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
GurnKiller
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2319 Location: Central NJ
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
BowlZ
Joined: 14 Sep 2007 Posts: 1472 Location: Aurora, Ohio
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 4:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
GurnKiller wrote: | Time We Had is not optimal... leaves you with 1/4 OD. Not sure what optimal is. |
0-0-1 or 0-0-0-1 for it. I dont remember how many activations there are. Skip 1 at the very end is all I know _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
EaterOfCheese
Joined: 19 Jan 2008 Posts: 175
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
GurnKiller wrote: | Nightmare is missing a last activation. It should be 0/OB in mm. 129. |
Yep, you're right. Not sure how I missed that..
GurnKiller wrote: | Time We Had is not optimal... leaves you with 1/4 OD. Not sure what optimal is. |
Are you sure you skipped the last activation? I just watched double checked with the charts and watched a video of the song (incorrect OD path, but they just didn't skip the last, so I could see that it worked), but I can see how it would be done right. Like BowlZ said, it SHOULD be right. Iunno though. Double check.
GurnKiller wrote: | When You Were Young is not optimal. Should be 0/OG, 1/OG, 1/OB. |
Went back and checked your path out on the spreadsheet compared to 1 - 0 - 2 and mine came out higher by ~2400 (probably closer to 2000). *shrug* I really wish I could FC these songs myself to test =/ I'll just put both of them up... _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
GurnKiller
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2319 Location: Central NJ
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TheGuitarist22
Joined: 20 May 2007 Posts: 162 Location: Central New Jersey
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 5:43 pm Post subject: Say It Ain't So |
|
|
Say It Ain't So Optimal Path is:
0-1-0
I don't know the squeezes, i just used
0/OG- 1/OG- 0/OG
For the squeeze path. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GurnKiller
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2319 Location: Central NJ
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TheGuitarist22
Joined: 20 May 2007 Posts: 162 Location: Central New Jersey
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Gurn for posting the squeezes. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GurnKiller
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2319 Location: Central NJ
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|