| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
JCirri
Joined: 04 Feb 2006
Posts: 4576
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:43 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Note Chart |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
violinhero86
Joined: 18 Nov 2007
Posts: 376
Location: Brown University - Providence, RI
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, fcphantom and AJay just dumped a bunch of paths in response to me going crazy with the path-finding, so I guess I'll give up the last good one I was holding onto. Here you go. 
3/immediate
2/immediate
2/next opportunity
2/wait one activation
2/wait one activation |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
themoron112
Joined: 19 Feb 2008
Posts: 616
|
| Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 12:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Seems like only logical path but any better? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheTinkerbread
Joined: 10 Apr 2008
Posts: 406
Location: Seattle, WA
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i think this path is right
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kawigi
Joined: 27 Feb 2008
Posts: 2879
Location: Redmond, WA
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As far as I'm concerned, it's perfectly right. 2/wait 2 on the fourth activation is also just as good (activating right before the "wham bam thank you ma'am), although I guess the squeeze isn't quite as easy.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
duck
Joined: 03 Feb 2007
Posts: 2968
Location: The Neighborhood Pond
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| why is this song so ridiculous. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kawigi
Joined: 27 Feb 2008
Posts: 2879
Location: Redmond, WA
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| duck wrote: | | why is this song so ridiculous. |
I think it's ridiculous because it's David Bowie. But then again, I don't really understand the question :-)
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BowlZ 
Joined: 14 Sep 2007
Posts: 1472
Location: Aurora, Ohio
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
are the only 2 activations with sqz points the first 2? Or are some people magically squeezing in the 'Quite' at the ends of the 4th
and if the 1st 2 are the only ones is -100 points off the last 3 digits (no idea on thousands) the max on the 2nd sqz with 468 being bills #1 score on the 1st sqz?
did any of that make sense?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kawigi
Joined: 27 Feb 2008
Posts: 2879
Location: Redmond, WA
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BowlZ wrote: | are the only 2 activations with sqz points the first 2? Or are some people magically squeezing in the 'Quite' at the ends of the 4th
and if the 1st 2 are the only ones is -100 points off the last 3 digits (no idea on thousands) the max on the 2nd sqz with 468 being bills #1 score on the 1st sqz?
did any of that make sense? |
I think it is the first two activations that have squeeze. I'm reasonably sure that the maximum squeeze on the second one is 2900 points (probably the -100 you're seeing), and the best I've got written down for myself on the first 2436 (which, if I had nailed the second squeeze, would have paced me for 293336 on the song).
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
